Welcome to EVE!

EVE is a group of people committed to creating Equal Visibility Everywhere for women. We're a brand-new (March 2010) not-for-profit dedicated to achieving gender parity in the symbols and icons of the United States.

We're taking on statues, stamps, street names, currency, national holidays, and more.

bloglogo
Suzanne Scoggins

by Suzanne Scoggins
August 26, 2010 · 1 Comment »  

(Ed. Note: This op-ed is being published in the Baltimore Sun on Thursday, August 26, 2010.)

On Aug. 26, 1920 — 90 years ago today — women became voting citizens of the United States. That was the day the 19th Amendment became law, finally writing women’s suffrage into the Constitution. In remembrance of the occasion, Congress in 1971 designated Aug. 26 as Women’s Equality Day. It’s a name that never fails to provoke a reaction among women I know. “Equality Day?” someone will say, eyebrow raised. “Oh, so we’re equal now?”

Well, are we?

It depends on what you mean by equal. Legally, women in the U.S. have come a long way. The 19th Amendment was the first big breakthrough, though it certainly didn’t spell instant equality. Women were still discriminated against in wages and hiring, barred from many professions, denied credit and loans, and in some states prohibited from making contracts, serving on juries or controlling their own property. But by 1971, those restrictions were falling by the wayside. Through a patchwork of legislative victories and court decisions from the 1960s on, women’s equality under the law was gradually established. It’s still not complete, and the basic principle has still never been enshrined in the Constitution (that would be the late lamented Equal Rights Amendment), but most of the pieces are in place.

Equality isn’t just a question of laws, though. There’s legal equality, and then there’s social equality. For women to have both, we need more than just legal rights. We need a culture that values women’s full range of abilities and recognizes women’s achievements. We need a social environment free of sexist double standards, in which women are routinely celebrated as leaders, thinkers, workers, scientists, artists, and athletes. And in this respect, equality is still far away.

Our daughters know this, even if we adults like to tell ourselves otherwise. During the last presidential campaign, Newsweek editor Jon Meacham was shocked when his 3-year-old daughter informed him that “girls can’t be president.” But the child had made a perfectly rational deduction. She’d seen the portraits: 42 men, zero women. Clearly a trend.

In my own family, a young relative explained to me once that “girls can’t be scientists.” An acquaintance tells a similar story about her daughter playing a game of make-believe “office” with friends. The boys were the bosses and the girls were the secretaries. “Why don’t you be a boss?” the woman asked her daughter. “Girls aren’t bosses,” replied the youngster.

Kids are smart. Job One for little humans is to learn how to be big humans, and to that end children are frighteningly keen observers. We can tell them all day long that men and women are equal, that girls can be anything they want — but that’s not what they see.

Think about what the world looks like from a young girl’s perspective. When she watches TV, she sees that almost all the serious talking heads belong to men and almost all the nearly-naked bodies belong to women. Most of the movies she watches have male protagonists, as do most of the TV shows. She likely lives on a street named after a man, goes to a school named after a man, celebrates holidays named after men, and buys her lunch with money that has only men’s pictures on it. And when her class takes a field trip to the U.S. Capitol, she learns that of the 100 great Americans fit to be honored in National Statuary Hall, all but nine are men.

That’s the stuff we need to change.

If we want our daughters to have a chance at full equality — social as well as legal — we need to create a culture that sends the right messages. We can start by making sure that women’s achievements are depicted and celebrated everywhere: in our media and monuments, our history books and holidays. Statuary Hall is a perfect example. One of the goals of my organization, Equal Visibility Everywhere, is to persuade state lawmakers to contribute more statues of women to the hall. We’ve just gotten sign-off from Kansas for a new statue of Amelia Earhart. Here in Maryland we’re pushing for a statue of Harriet Tubman, the woman who rose from slavery to become “the Moses of her people.”

Forget the old-fashioned argument that men are the ones who made all the history. Women played their part in the American story whether men gave them credit or not. Women led tribes and founded towns, built factories and farms, plotted revolution and preached revival. They chased buffalo across the plains and hacked a living out of the soil. They flew airplanes and threw baseballs, mined gold and milled cotton. They were inventors and artists, poets and philosophers, soldiers and scientists.

And they still are. Women are everything, and it’s time we shaped our cultural messages to reflect that. Only then will we be able to say, “Yes, we’re equal now.”

Share this:
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • FriendFeed
  • Digg
  • NewsVine
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Print this article!
  • RSS

Read more posts in the EVE Blog

Project Update: Statuary Hall

It’s official: Amelia Earhart will be the tenth woman in Statuary Hall

August 24, 2010 by Suzanne Scoggins   · 2 Comments »

EarhartAnd EVE has been entrusted with the responsibility for making it happen.

I promised a couple of months ago that we had two very big announcements brewing, both of them related to Amelia Earhart. The first was the parade balloon, which is on schedule for a debut this fall.

The second announcement is this: the Governor of Kansas has just signed off on replacing the statue of John James Ingalls in Statuary Hall with a new statue of Amelia Earhart. EVE is named as the party responsible for raising the money and commissioning the statue.

I’ll just quote our press release:

August 23 — It’s official: Kansas will replace its statue of John James Ingalls in the U.S. Capitol with a new sculpture of famed aviator Amelia Earhart.

Ingalls has represented Kansas for more than a century in the National Statuary Hall Collection, which features two statues of illustrious citizens from each state. Amelia Earhart will become only the tenth woman to be honored with a statue in the collection.

Equal Visibility Everywhere (EVE), a national non-profit dedicated to achieving gender parity in the country’s symbols and icons, has been given responsibility for raising the funds for the statue and commissioning the artist.

…continue reading

Share this:
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • FriendFeed
  • Digg
  • NewsVine
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Print this article!
  • RSS

Read more posts in Statuary Hall Project Updates

Project Update: Celebrations

Ta-da! Official artist sketch of the Amelia Earhart balloon!

August 17, 2010 by Suzanne Scoggins   · 3 Comments »

Here it is, the artist’s rendering of the new Amelia Earhart balloon:

balloon_paradeview1

Bear in mind this thing will be humongous—with a 40-foot wingspan, it will be the same size as the real airplane!

The art has been through several iterations and tweaked in response to feedback from EVE’s 99 Club, and now it’s ready to go. The Earhart Estate has approved the renderings and the engineering crew is ready to start sculpting the clay model. (There are other elevations too, showing the balloon from all angles, but this one gives the best overall view I think.)

Now for the hard sell: if you haven’t already donated to the 99 Club, please consider helping out.
The contributions we’ve received so far have enabled us to make the first payment on the balloon, pay for the parade banner, and pay for the balloon handler suits (they’re going to look like a ground crew in flight suits).

But we still need to raise the rest of the money to cover expenses. …continue reading

Share this:
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • FriendFeed
  • Digg
  • NewsVine
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Print this article!
  • RSS

Read more posts in Celebrations

Project Update: Media

Google Doodles and invisible women

July 27, 2010 by Suzanne Scoggins   · 3 Comments »

The Google Doodle logo honoring Alphonse Mucha, which Google ran on July 24, 2010, instead of honoring Amelia Earhart, whose birthday was the same day.  But hey, why honor a real-life heroine when you can put up calendar art of a fantasy sylph in a transparent gown?

The Google Doodle logo honoring Alphonse Mucha, which Google ran on July 24, 2010, instead of honoring Amelia Earhart, whose birthday was the same day. But hey, why honor a real-life heroine when you can put up calendar art of a fantasy sylph in a transparent gown?

Earlier this month I came across Shelby Knox’s post on how Google Doodles (you know what those are, right?) manage to almost entirely ignore women. I thought at the time, “oh wow, we have got to pull this together with our EVE stuff.”

And now we have. Or rather, Shelby Knox has, in this wonderful post about Google Doodles, Amelia Earhart, and EVE:

…continue reading

Share this:
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • FriendFeed
  • Digg
  • NewsVine
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Print this article!
  • RSS

Read more posts in Media Project

Project Update: Stamps

Even cartoon stamps ignore women

July 21, 2010 by Suzanne Scoggins   · 3 Comments »

usps_sc_sundayfunnies_bg

“Will Beetle Bailey ever run out of hideouts where he can catch a nap?” asks the AP, reporting on the U.S. Postal Service’s new series of stamps commemorating the Sunday funnies. “Will Sarge ever tire of tracking him down and putting him to work?”

Here’s another question: Will the folks at the post office ever miss an opportunity to ignore females?

I’m thinking the answer is no.

…continue reading

Share this:
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • FriendFeed
  • Digg
  • NewsVine
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Print this article!
  • RSS

Read more posts in Stamps

Project Update: Streets & Buildings

Beating the streets
Dolley Madison lived in the Octagon House after British troops burned the White House in the War of 1812.

The Octagon House was home to Dolley Madison after the White House burned.

In this summer heat, EVE volunteers have been beating the streets researching the names and addresses of famous women who were born in D.C. or spent part of their lives in D.C. In our quest for equal visibility, we found out some interesting things.

  • Jackie Kennedy lived in five different addresses in D.C. …all in Georgetown.
  • Other First Ladies have also lived in Washington, D.C., exclusive of the White House. Eleanor Roosevelt lived on R Street NW, Dolley Madison was a resident of the Octagon House, and Mary Todd Lincoln spent many months at the Lincoln Cottage on the grounds of the Soldiers’ Home.
  • …continue reading

Share this:
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • FriendFeed
  • Digg
  • NewsVine
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Print this article!
  • RSS

Read more posts in Streets & Buildings Project Updates

Project Update: Currency

Brother, can you spare a quarter?

From the U.S. Mint:

“Launched in 1999, the United States Mint’s 50 State Quarters Program was a 10-year initiative that honored each of the nation’s states in the order that they ratified the Constitution or were admitted into the Union. Each quarter was produced for about 10 weeks and will never be produced again. State designs are displayed on the reverse (tails) of the quarters, while the obverse design displays the familiar image of George Washington.”

4statequartersSo what’s the problem? Each state got their own quarter, as did the District of Columbia and each of the five U.S. Territories (Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa, U.S. Virgin Islands, Northern Mariana Islands, and American Samoa), for a total of 56 beautiful brand new quarters, celebrating the history and grandeur of the United States.

It’s not the fact that the states got the quarters that’s a problem. It’s what they collectively chose to put on the quarters that’s a problem. Many states chose to illustrate America’s noteworthy topological features such as the Great Lakes (Michigan), the Rocky Mountains (Colorado) and the 10,000 lakes (Minnesota). Some states chose to honor significant historical events such as the Louisiana Purchase (Louisiana) or the journey westward by wagon train (Nebraska). Animals were a popular choice: Alaska appropriately chose the bear, Washington State the salmon, and Oklahoma their state bird, the scissortail flycatcher. The quarters are all unique and beautiful.

But here’s the rub. Ten states chose to honor specific individuals or events associated with individuals. Nine of those states honored men. Only one state honored a woman.

What men were honored? John Muir (California), Caesar Rodney (Delaware), King Kamehameha I (Hawaii), Abraham Lincoln (Illinois), Lewis and Clark (Missouri), George Washington Crossing the Delaware (New Jersey), the Wright Brothers’ first flight (North Carolina), the four presidents of Mount Rushmore (South Dakota), and Duke Ellington (Washington, D.C.). If you include Massachusetts’ quarter depicting a Minuteman and Wyoming’s quarter with a cowboy riding a bucking bronco, there are actually eleven quarters honoring men or featuring prominent male figures. Eleven.

Who was the lone woman honored in this sea of masculinity? Helen Keller, from the great state of Alabama. My hat is off to her.

The lack of women on our nation’s quarters is a serious issue. These quarters are not a relic from the past. They were minted between 1999 and 2009, and women still were not included. Out of the 112 images that comprise the fronts and backs of our nation’s quarters, there is only one picture of one woman.

Have we contributed nothing to our country? How did we become so invisible? What does this say to our sons and daughters about the status of women?

Share this:
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • FriendFeed
  • Digg
  • NewsVine
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Print this article!
  • RSS

Read more posts in Currency